An Indian think-tanker told Sputnik India that the ongoing "structural interlinking" of Eurasia, including Iran, Russia and India, would be "game changer", which would make Eurasia as important for Indian policymakers as Indo-Pacific is at present.
The strategic potential on the two trade corridors connecting Russia and India – Chennai Vladivostok Eastern Maritime Corridor (EMC) and the International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC) – could turn the Eurasia into the most important region for India's long-term strategic interests, a Dubai-based think-tanker told Sputnik India on the margins of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) on Thursday.
The comments were made on the second day of the annual geo-economic forum, running from 5 to 8 June, in the northern Russian city. Delegates and officials from nearly 139 countries are participating in the four-day event.
Atul Aneja, the Member of Advisory Council at Dubai-based think tank Center of Geo-economics for the Global South (COGGS), said that a significant portion of India-Russia oil trade was taking place through the Chennai-Vladivostok Corridor connecting Russian Far-East to India's southern coast.
Aneja however stressed that there was a pressing need for fully operationalising the INSTC in view of rapid diversification of Russia-India bilateral trade, which hit a record of $65.7 billion in 2023-24.
"The INSTC is going to be the real artery for trade between Russia and India. Now, that route is interesting because from Russia, it goes southwards to the Caspian Sea, Central Asia and Iran. From Persian Gulf, it moves towards Mumbai (on India's western coast) by sea," the think-tanker said.
The Dubai-based, Indian-origin expert highlighted that the Iranian port of Chabahar near Bandar Abbas (located at INSTC route) also had the potential to become another "artery" of the INSTC, more so since New Delhi and Tehran last month signed a long-term contract for developing one of its terminals.
'Possibility of an India-Russia-Iran Energy Corridor'
Aneja said that there was always the possibility of adding "energy corridors" to the INSTC, which would not only increase its strategic value but also attract more investments to the areas lying on the INSTC routes.
Explaining the strategic proposition of an "energy corridor" further, Aneja said that New Delhi was already invested "big time" in Iran's logistics because of the Chabahar Port and due to the fact that Indian government agency Border Roads Organization (BRO) had developed a land route between Iran and Afghanistan.
Aneja expressed hope that the increased interlinking of and interdependence among Russia, India and Iran would reap economic and geopolitical benefits, noting that energy dependence among the three nations, all members of BRICS, would transform the triangular ties into a truly strategic partnership.
"It would be a partnership of necessity. You can't get out of it, so it will endure the geopolitical alignment because your dependence on Russian and Iranian gas would be so much. And so the partnership of Russia, Iran becomes a very strong political geopolitical bond which cannot be disrupted because of this interdependence. And that I think dual economics will decide the geopolitics," Aneja reckoned.
At present, the LNG trade between Russia and India is yet to take off, while India's imports of oil and gas from Iran remain all but suspended due to US sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear program.
'Africa Could Turn into a Lab for BRICS'
Dwelling on the topic of how to make BRICS into an "economic powerhouse", Aneja said that the nine-nation grouping should move beyond slogans and start focussing on practical projects.
He suggested that Africa as a continent had the potential to become a "laboratory" for BRICS economies to implement their geo-economics agenda.
"I think Africa is going to be a big laboratory for the BRICS to really translate the political alignment into economic projects and bring prosperity to people. On the ground, that would mean breaking cycles of poverty and creating new growth engines," stated Aneja.
The Global South expert reckoned that BRICS should align its geo-economics agenda with Agenda 2063 of African Development Bank Group.
Additionally, he said that the intergovernmental organization could also look at pursuing connectivity projects in Latin America, Africa and other geographies in order to transform into a truly influential grouping in Global South.
"Otherwise, I'm afraid what happened; let's say with the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), you know, that's a pity, because it got many countries together. But you could never get the geo-economic trend going. And that's the reason why NAM did not realize its full potential," Aneja cautioned.